00:00
00:00
JakBaronKing
"The best way to change the world is to first change yourself."

Age 37, Male

Inside my own mind.......

Joined on 9/27/07

Level:
50
Exp Points:
27,666 / 27,750
Exp Rank:
454
Vote Power:
9.12 votes
Art Scouts
10+
Rank:
Police Lieutenant
Global Rank:
6,050
Blams:
430
Saves:
1,074
B/P Bonus:
14%
Whistle:
Normal
Trophies:
1
Medals:
961
Supporter:
4y
Gear:
28

Has Hasbro made the word "Derp" offensive? Equivalent to other derogatory language!?

Posted by JakBaronKing - March 2nd, 2012


I 'nerd-raged' a little regarding the character "Derpy Hooves" and it's recent censorship.

But thinking deeper upon this....it's much more than just supporting a cartoon character you like.

This is all about our 'freedom of expression' without 'oppression' or 'animosity'.

Think about the word 'derp'....it's a 'slang' right? As in...made up.

It's interpretation is all in the individuals or groups, and I noticed that how people react to certain words or phrases, it reveals a part of their personality.

I would like to reefer to the episode "The Story of the Whomps" from "Recess" again.
PLEASE WATCH THIS WHOLE EPISODE. It expresses my point VERY clearly through the characters.
*This is more about a sociological level of thinking rather than just a fandom rage.

Notably enough, those that hold the..."pole up their ass", will generally find certain means of expression offensive and liberating for punishment.

I remember as a child...I used to get 'SLAPED' by my strict father for 'sighing' when he scolded me.
*It was a Japanese thing, don't worry about it.

That's the key element. Sociological interpretation. And all slang has this affect on people and is regarded for it's quality by the mass appeal or disapproval. And eventually, certain words are considered okay. The idea of making up new words is the means of avoiding trouble to those who say otherwise.

Damn became Dang.
Hell became Heck or Hey.
etc.

Even extended how certain racial slurs came about.
I remember back in the early 90's it was more appropriate to call someone 'African American' rather than 'Black.'

Hasbro & Hub have done something FAR terrible than covering their asses to protect their 'sensitive viewers'.

They've defined the word "derp" as being OFFENSIVE.

By censoring a cartoon character...they've changed the meaning of how this word "Derp" can be used.

No longer is "Derp" considered playful and fun to use whenever you are working, mess up, and laugh about it.

People might actually file LAWSUITS when someone casually uses the word "Derp" in a work environment

This course of action, especially by influential television viewers, will now see a harmless word as a 'hateful' word.

Course, written above is just a 'Worst Case Scenario' situation.

But it's something to think about when our freedom of expression is always going to be judged.

People should just learn to understand the 'intentions' and 'emotions' of people and not just their words.

As I said before...even so called 'offensive' language could be expressed with kindness and grace if spoken by a kind person.

And especially 'safe' language could be expressed with cruelty and harm if spoken by a hateful person.

It's the WAY how words are used, structured, and how they are spoken with certain tone.

Television has a HUGE affect on the masses, especially the youth.

And I worry what the outcome will be because of this action of censorship.

Hopefully, I can use the word "derp" and not get into trouble.


Comments

I just think it's backpedaling from making Derpy over-the-edge retarded.

Even if that were the case, I think Hasbro should've stuck to their guns; maybe there are little girls out there that have crossed eyes and there's nothing they can do about it...maybe those cross-eyed kids could find a relatable trait in Derpy. Either way, the "ditziness" in her was always cute and endearing, not overpowering and shameful....Hasbro's making a mistake, but maybe they'll realize that. Hell, they aren't going to refer to her by anything else, methinks.

But come now. Censorship is easing off a pebble at a time. Take this comparison, My Little Pony and Transformers in the 80's versus MLP:FiM and Transformers Prime now.

The current generation has ASTONISHING depth to it, because it knows kids are smarter. So while Hasbro might be a little light-footed in their fears of pissing off a parent with Derps, they're simultaneously challenging that core demographic's thought processes with some pretty adult dilemma's and ethical situations. Hell, in Transformers Prime, it's fuckin' DARK. Millions of Autobots and Decepticons have died, and there's gruesome flashbacks to atrocities in the Cybertron war...it restores faith that Hasbro hasn't completely lost their spine.

They SHOULD'VE stuck with their original intentions.

It really was a 'tip-of-the-hat' to the fans. And it could've been a break-trough for demonstrating a realistic character you'd might see in real life.

If the show really is about being 'accepting' and 'tolerant' of others, by censoring Derpy, they clearly went against their own message.

Course...cleverly enough, they didn't 'really' censor her. But they 'DID' change her voice and 'EYES' a key feature of why this character is different.

...

Is the new Transformers series really that good? I'll have to give it a try.

...

Very well said man.

Thanks for commenting!

Hasbro is a business, They are about the bottom dollar. They arent the types to cater to anyone really.
Last thing they want is a certain character fan created or not to take a life of its own out side of the franchise. While obviously I cant say for sure their reasoning for removing is as noble as they set out to be.. I personally believe they dont want the show to fall into some deranged cult status from which they lose their demographic.
Think how quickly ren and stimpy was cancelled after the creators went full gross out. They dont want their show derailed by adult fanbased nonsense.
But yah it sucks. I have no problem with the word derp.

They could've easily accepted "Derpy" as an official character. From what I hear, it's as easy as changing the rating of the TV show.

After all...what is a program without it's supporting viewers? And fandom is something unavoidable, it's what inspired 'you' to make robots from your childhood robot movies and games right? EI: Robotech?

The demographic of the show has 'obviously' not hit their intended target. And they should just roll with it. They would make TONS of money with Derpy merchandise.

In fact...Lauren did a charity drawing of Derpy and earned over 5,000 dollars.

But they might actually lose their demographic because of this action.

Ren & Stimpy actually ran a good while before it was canceled, and for some reason, these characters still appear as playable characters in modern-day 'Nick' video games for kids.

It DOES suck. And I think Hasbro has actually made a huge step backwards. Since the word, character, and setting has already been put into play, they can't hide it.

So by hiding it, it leaves bad interpretations to their reasons.

So...Hasbro could be sued for either reasons.

---

I remember back in the day there was this 'one' Charlie Brown episode

"Why Charlie Brown Why?" which tells the story about a child with Cancer.

I was kinda hoping this Derpy character was a break-through in presenting a sensitive matter about being 'physically and emotionally different' to a young and understanding public.

And that it would eventually bring about more 'sensitive' issues to script out for future episodes.

Like...the fan-base has been AMAZING about this.

An artist named "PashaPup" on deviant art has made a few comics about the ponies pertaining to sensitive subjects such as 'cancer' and a lost 'loved one'.

In her short wordless comic, Pinkie Pie is happy because she acknowledges that life is temporary and that you should cherish it and make everyone happy. Her sister was dying slowly of cancer but she kept her spirits up by throwing parties for her till the day she passed.

In another wordless comic she wrote, Rainbow Dash acts tough because she actually lost her mother. Deep down, she's still very sensitive and vulnerable.

Children need to learn what unhappiness and loss is about, also about ethical views of being different.

I was hoping that the MLP series would branch out on these topics for the sake of education.

To view these 'harsh truths on life' in a positive and happy manner.

-----

Thanks for commenting!

I think that episode of Recess perfectly illustrates whats going on. New things are scary to older people. That isnt meant as a derogatory jab, but more an honest truth. I think especially now with the internet and the speed of information traveling, its hard for older generations (who didnt have access to the things kids do these days) become very uneasy about new things. So here comes a new word and they dont know how to deal with it, and the natural human thing is to classify it as threatning if something is foreign. Just natural human way of dealing with the unknown.

I dont think its an act of censorship per se, i think its just the natural evolution of a word and language thats ever changing.

You have words that go into extinction, words that end up meaning something totally different, words that are turned into verbs/adjectives/nouns/names, etc.

I remember as a kid, my mother would scold me for saying 'sucks'. I think nowadays those types of words have more or less crept into the accepted fiber of conversation, and are no longer 'taboo' or whatever, as kids shows rated G use it.

Its unfortunate when this happens but i think its a natural occurrence of a changing language.

I've been watching alot of old shit lately, like the Frank Sinatra show of the 50's. He uses the term 'gay' quite often. Like care-free and gay. Contexts that are no longer 'acceptable' in todays standards, be it due to the rise in homophobia, or the taboo aspect that the term gay/homosexual carries with ti. Whatever the case, it goes to show that even in today's standards where you figure that by now humans have become more open minded about things there are still some terms that are 'banned'.

It is a natural way of viewing things.

And we honestly can't control the thoughts of others. Nor 'truely' convince them of one view point vs another. Even by me saying this 'I cannot convince even myself that I can convince myself.'

When the world is constantly changing EVERY minute...how can you keep up?

Well...obviously the BEST solution that Hasbro should've done was NOT mention Derpy at all. But since they already did, by censoring and altering her character, they could affect the definition of how this word could be viewed.

Hopefully as you said, as time goes by, the words of today will become less crept for our public usage.

God damn, the internet is amazing. Frank Sinatra was such a womanizing class act tom-cat. How our culture quickly evolves and changes. It'll never stop.

And it's moving even FASTER than before.

I kinda hope that with the internet, we can be more open-minded.

That's kinda why I like Newgrounds so much. It's definition is in the slogan.

"Everything by Everyone"

Thanks for commenting!

I feel what your saying about how it looks to children, the effect it might have on them and the positive effect it could have potentially made. Accepting differences.

It's funny that you bring this up now because today I just watched an episode of 30 Rock called "The C word". Were Liz Lemon was mad one of her writers had called her a cunt, and talked to a workmate about it:

Pete Hornberger: Well, you know, he was probably just blowing off steam. You can't fire a guy for cursing.

Liz Lemon: No, I - I'm not upset by cursing. I *love* cursing. I love it! But this word is not acceptable - no - because there's nothing you can call a guy back. There is no male equivalent to this word.

Pete Hornberger: Well, why don't we come up with one, and then you can call him that? Like, um, "muncus."

Frank Rossitano: "Fungdark."

Liz Lemon: What?! No that won't work!

Pete Hornberger: You're just in reaction right now. You need to just take a few hours and calm down.

Liz Lemon: Don't tell me to calm down, you fungdark!!

Pete Hornberger: Yeah, you're right; it doesn't work.
---

Actually one of my major experiences with this "word phenomenon" was with "the C word". I. thought.. nothing of that word. Until a guy off evenhandedly used it on a field trip ...and a girl went off on him! I was astonished lol I didn't know its power. Now every time I even think about saying cunt my mouth feels dirty.
---
See, the reaction is what causes the "force" of the word. How people react. --In a room full of 'sailor mouths' ..curses loose there shock. --again by pure happenstance, I was watching this last night. Were Donald Glover was explaining what makes the word "N***a" so powerful.

It's a long vid ..go to 19:50

<a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H_-5Zzwg12M&feature=BFa&list=HL1330749478&lf=mh_lolz">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H_-5Zzwg12M&amp ;feature=BFa&list=HL1330749478&lf=mh_l olz</a>
--

Now that I've typed a bit ..if reaction makes the word strong. Then I see how derpy is becoming a derogatory word. ..hmm..

I agree with Mindchamber, Hasbro might have alternate reasons for wanting to get rid of derpy. Most likely they don't want to have to cater to that demographic. They don't want to feed Bronies :p (speaking halv out the arse hear cuz I'm only going by hearsay) But, I do see that being the case. I mean, if they would just roll with it ..I could imagine now them in a meeting thinking "..Okay, how do we gear marketing to 30 yr old men?" lol

Holy text limit

Man...that word...cunt....sheesh. It really has power of offensive towards women and men!
That 30's Rock show is pretty clever too.

But...it's true what I said before. Words have no 'real' power. It's the intentions behind the word and the tone and like you said...how it's used. Words are all made-up.

I don't think it's about about catering to a specific age demographic, cause animation can be enjoyed by any age.

And oddly enough, the popularity of any form of animation has INCREASED with this generation.

Statistics read that most Bronies are actually college students, not 30 year old men. There's just that one 30 year old guy on youtube.

It's just the fact remains that this show...'they did something that acknowledges the fans, they can't take it back, so they might as well just roll with it and forget about it.' and never to do it again.

But I am now ALMOST CERTAIN that kids in elementary and teens in high school might get into trouble for saying the word 'Derp'.

I have a strong feeling that this particular form of 'fandom' will spark the biggest form of 'nerd-rage' that will soon publicize into various forms of ethical situations.

I don't agree with taking things too far. But I can see it happening.

Thanks for commenting.

30 Rock, that show is the definition of clever. The Dialog ..it is thee wittiest show I've ever watched. (started watching it on Netflix)

"There's just that one 30 year old guy on youtube."

hahahaha, yeh ino, I was rounding up in age to be more dramatic ^^

I have this friend working in Canada who became close friends with a black guy. He told me that he wanted to call the guy the n-word because the black guy told him that he was his n****. And he wanted to show his affection as well since it would appear that they had become very close. The black guy told him that he can't do that in public because it would look bad. My friend could, however, call him the n-word when it was only the two of them and no other guys can hear. So they decided that they'd call each other "Ninja" in public which should mean the n-word but nobody would know. It was their code. But what if my friend and this guy had a quarrel and he called him ninja in a different tone? Now the meaning would be fucked up and the reactions would be entirely different. Words being able to bear different meanings all the time makes it possible to mean anything with any word. Even the way some art forms, especially the abstract ones are very vague, easily allow people to substitute their own meanings. And as you would say Jak that the majority who agrees that something is bad makes it a rule for everyone to follow. Maybe someone could turn the word "construe" into a bad word. I really hate this word.

I have always hated the word derp. Along with other countless shitty 4chan memes. Please act your age and NOT use something that an idiotic second grader would enjoy laughing at.

You've gone over these points a little already, but I'd say that it could be a number of things at play here or a combination. Firstly, Hasbro could be prematurely squelching something that they think may have an offensive connotation, or else they've observed the meaning of the word in action and feel that it's leaning too far toward something that could be offensive for their tastes. If they've observed that it's a way to label less intelligent people of whatever nature, it would kind of be understandable if they wanted to disconnect themselves from its use, they've developed a wildly popular brand and it probably wouldn't be in their best interests to risk seeming as though they were promoting or encouraging anything that might be tantamount to a form of bullying, even if it were only in the form of labeling.
Secondly, it could be more simply that they're aware that it's something that comes from "the internet" and are uneasy about adopting its use as they perhaps aren't in a position to be sure that they know what it means, and if it's safe to be using.
Thirdly, along the same lines as my previous point, it could also be that they view it as something too niche or "memey", like an inside joke for internet culture, that would be lost on (or even confusing for) their television demographic. They may also even feel that as it's a meme-related term, it could easily die out at any time and would make the episode or character seem outdated very quickly, and thus less culturally relevant instead of more.
It could really be any or a combination of the above... the thing to remember is that as much as the new generation MLP seems to be a really "with the times" kind of ultra-modern post-saturday-morning-cartoon pop culture brand, it's also a very tightly controlled corporate product with a very deliberate brand identity. Any decisions to incorporate references from external pop culture sources would be deliberated on very seriously and will always favor brand longevity and safety rather than appealing to something that just seems cool at the time. Which may seem contradictory or strange on account of pop culture itself being something that appeals by just seeming cool at the time, but hey, that's showbiz

You know what...your right.

Any of those three assumptions could fit with the situation. I'm just upset that they changed it.

But hey, it is showbiz and from what I hear, the DVD versions are going to be unedited.

Thanks for replying to a post that I ranted about.